|
CYLINDER HEAD 101 Lance M
Wolrab December 29th '04
BACKGROUND In our search for power, at the
heart of every engine's inherent ability to make torque is the
cylinder head. Why? Because no matter what else you do
to an engine, if it is going to make more power, it has to move more
air. Of course there are a number of givens that must be
addressed before we get to modifying the head. It is
understood that the bottom end must be built to withstand the power
we expect to make, and that the fasteners holding the head to the
engine are up to the task. Not to mention the tuner must
ensure that the right amount of high octane fuel is mixing with the
air we are moving, and the ignition system must be up to the task of
lighting off the charge at precisely the right timing. But these
things are all in support of the one thing that separates powerful
engines from not powerful engines: the ability to move large amounts
of air efficiently through the intake and out the exhaust.
SO WHERE DO WE START?
Conventional wisdom says buy the fastest thing you can afford,
then modify it. Since you are here, I will assume that you are
working with a 2JZ-GTE, which is certainly a good choice. I
will also assume that you are a true power junkie, and that big
power is your goal. Toyota has built a powerhouse in this
engine, and to say that they did a wonderful job of over-engineering
it is an understatement. But there is room for improvement.
Once we remove the head from the engine,
there are a number of things that become obvious. Most
important is that for some reason, Toyco decided to point all the
exhaust ports toward the stock turbos. The ports from #1 and
#6 are long and steeply angled toward the engine center. The
ports from #3 and #4 are angled slightly toward #1 and #6. This is
unique. In combination with the OEM log manifold, there is
little more that Toyco could have done to choke the engine.
Why they chose this route is specifically known only to them,
but I would hazard a guess that they were very concerned about
packaging, and wanted to squeeze the set up as much as possible.
They succeeded in that. After a
cursory look in the ports, we move on to the factory valve job. From
what I have seen so far, the OEM valve job is pretty good for a
production job, and they did take a little extra time to blend the
valve seats into the ports. This is uncommon in other engines,
and negates a great deal of the expected gains from a "street port"
job. The bulk of the improvements on a so called street port
are from blending the valve seats into the shape of the ports.
Toyco has already done most of that for us. Any porting
to be done at this point is going to have to be carefully planned
with specific goals in mind. Preliminary testing of a Supra
head showed me that the intakes are very nice, and respond nicely to
increased valve lift, a clear sign of a good port design. On
the other hand, the exhausts are diabolical. Japanese engine
theory bases exhaust port design on thermodynamics, not airflow.
It is not uncommon for an American tuner to see large gains in
performance by just opening up the exhaust ports on Japanese
engines. This is not simple or easy with the 2JZ-GTE.
The stock exhaust ports fail to flow any more air at about 8mm
of lift (0.317"). Increasing high lift flow is the first thing
on the mind of the man holding the die grinder. Still there is
not a lot to be gained. For these reasons,
staggered cam sizes seem to work well in the Supra. A longer
duration exhaust cam combined with a shorter duration intake cam can
yield surprising results. Never forget, your cams must
compliment the engine. Part of that is recognizing that valve
lift over 8mm on the exhaust only promotes valve spring failure.
For that reason, I don't recommend exceeding stock lift on the
exhaust side. There is no advantage except in the driver's
mind. Once we have the cams chosen, the next
item in the head that needs attention is the valve springs.
The OEM springs are just about soft enough to collapse with a
thumb and forefinger. Well, maybe not quite that bad, but you
get the picture. The OEM springs have a 40 lb seat pressure.
With adequate boost, it is theoretically possible to actually
blow the valves open, and if you are running 30+ psi on race gas,
you are getting into the marginal performance area for stock
springs. It used to be that the only stiffer springs available
were around 80 lbs seat pressure. While that is a nice
thought, it is very hard on the valves and the seats. There
are now, fortunately, springs in the 60 lb range available.
They provide enough seat pressure to positively close the
valves without hammering the seats, valve stems, retainers, and
keepers to death. Valve cooling depends on good closure, the
heat from the valve head is transferred to the cooling system
through the valve seat, so good contact is a must.
Before we move on to cutting the seats, retainers and keepers
need a moment of attention. You will see titanium retainers
touted as the gnat's eyebrows for keeping your valves happy and safe
from valve float. If you have a lot of money to spend, they won't
hurt, but titanium does have a shorter service life than steel.
Titanium will tend to fret where steel is a little more
resilient. The reason I bring this up is because the 2JZ-GTE
is not known for floating its valves, in fact, even with the wimpy
stock springs there have been some really powerful engines built
that lasted quite well. I would call titanium retainers
completely optional in my build up, and leave it to the customer's
discretion whether he wanted to spend that money on retainers with a
marginal performance increase, or spend that money somewhere else
where it might have a more significant effect. That said, I
would HIGHLY recommend them on ANY race engine. There is an
insurance factor that comes with them that is appropriate for a
competition engine, but I would be expecting to disassemble and
inspect that engine at least every season.
SEAT CUTTING Here's where we touch on a
little religion. In the time I have been working with cylinder
heads (about 20 years now), I have found that there are two distinct
schools of thought on valve contact seat width. Some prefer
wider, some prefer narrower. The wider guys claim longer valve
life through better heat transfer, the narrower guys claim better
heat transfer through crushing the carbon on the face of the valve
and seat with a higher psi on the narrower seat. Some flow
guys like wider seats and claim that narrow seats cause unwanted
turbulence, other guys think that narrow seats can be used to induce
useful turbulence. On street heads that won't see a lot of
very heavy duty use, I prefer narrower seats. On race engines
I always go wider. Typically, I use the manufacturer's spec, and
just apply the tight end of the tolerance for street and the wide
end for race. The other thing that I like to
do is to narrow the valve contact face to suit the width of the
seat. It does shorten the ultimate service life of the valve,
but it gets the port open in a hurry at very small lifts. I
typically set the contact face to 2.5 to 3 times the width of the
contact seat, so it measures somewhere between 3 and 4 millimeters.
I backcut the valve with somewhere between a 30 and 35 degree
cut until I have the valve face width where I want it. I
normally place the bottom edge of the contact seat about 1mm up from
the bottom edge of the valve contact face. I also use a drill
press and a die grinder with a coarse cartridge roll to smooth out
the valve stem where the head is welded to it. At the same
time, I am reducing the stem diameter to slightly more than the
diameter of the keeper groove (the weakest part of the stem) to get
as much material out of the port as possible. Finally, I
finish the valve with a clean 45 degree cut. The books like to
tell you to make a 45 degree seat and a 44.5 degree valve, but in my
experience, if the seat is properly cut, the interference objective
with the different angles doesn't help at all.
When the seats themselves are cut, you will need to address
the technology the machine shop uses. Most modern tuners,
myself included, swear by the Serdi carbide cutter technology.
This method provides the most consistent and concentric seats
from valve to valve that can be had. The other method still in
use involves abrasive stones cut at various angles and used in
sequence to cut the valve seats one angle at a time. It is
challenging, and sometimes very difficult to do really good work
with this method. It requires a skilled and patient operator
to do nice work with stones. I have done many, many, heads
with stones. It is still a viable technology, but given the choice
between the single cut carbide method and the abrasive stone method,
I'll take the cutters every time. When you
choose the cutters, you will probably be asked questions like:"Do
you want multiple angles or full radius?" "How many angles would you
like; 5, 7, or 9?""Will you be using the stock valves or do you want
to go oversize?""Will this head be ported?""Would you like us to
remove the guides for your port work, and reinstall them after
porting is complete" "Would you like the guides counterbored, cut
off square, or left alone after they are installed in the port?"
Now we get to the meat of the port work.
All of these questions are going to depend on your budget and
ultimate power goals. They will also depend on your port
artist's view of how to get air molecules moving through that port.
I have seen ports where the guides were completely blended in
to the roof of the port, and others where the guides were
practically untouched. The truth is, it will all depend on
where the gains (if any) can be made. Typically the biggest
gains are in the last 1/2" of the port before the valve. The
blending work of the seat and the shape of the port floor are the
two areas I typically work on first. The port floor should not have
any radical angle changes, the idea is to convince the air that it
wants to follow the port's inherent shape, and not argue with the
direction of the port wall. Angular changes will most
certainly discourage the molecules and they will tend to form little
pockets of undesirable turbulence. The same
is true for the roof and sides of the port, but generally these are
not where big improvements are made, unless there are significant
increases in overall size. Typically, I just knock down the
casting flash and provide a finish that makes sense for what is
happening next. If the exhaust ports are going to be coated with a
thermal barrier coating, I will leave a rough finish, if not, they
are easier to clean with a polished surface. Polishing does
little to enhance flow, but certainly makes clean up at the next
rebuild much easier. In fact, some tuners use polishing to
hide the flaws in their work, so if you do have the ports polished,
examine the work carefully, and last but not least NEVER polish
intakes. A slightly rough surface actually works much better
on the intake side. I usually finish intakes with a 150 grit
cartridge roll. It's a smooth surface, but not glassy smooth.
Back to port sizing. You are fighting
a battle between making the port large enough to flow the amount of
air that you want but still maintain enough velocity to promote good
cylinder filling AND good scavenging. This is where the art comes
in. The man with the die grinder has to be able to think like
an air molecule and create a shape that will give both volume and
velocity. The biggest complaint I have with the 2JZ-GTE head
is the exhaust ports are very small for very big power. This
is really good for velocity, and velocity is good for boost, but by
the same token, you have to be able to evacuate the exhaust manifold
reliably, or you will have exhaust bleeding back into cylinders that
are at the end of the power cycle. This causes a natural EGR
effect because the cylinder that you wanted to have empty and ready
for a fresh charge is now contaminated with inert end gases that
will dampen the combustion process on the next cycle. This is
why positive pressure is so desireable. Positive pressure is
when your manifold pressure is greater than your exhaust pressure.
With the OEM twins, this pressure ratio is negative, sometimes
as much as 3:1. Yes, that means when you are seeing 20 psi in
the intake manifold the exhaust manifold is seeing 60 (!) psi. With
the bigger turbos like the TO4R, this isn't nearly as big an issue,
and negative pressure ratios are smaller, so we are looking to
improve flow without sacrificing too much velocity.
I like to see port area between 80% and 85% of the
valve area in the exhausts. I will typically take a junk valve
and grind down the diameter to use as a guide, especially in exhaust
ports, to make sure that my walls stay somewhat round and not wavy,
and to let me know when I have gone far enough. It is possible
to go too big, although I don't think there's enough wall thickness
with the GTE head to get into size trouble without getting into very
serious wall thickness trouble. As I mentioned before, the
intakes are really quite nice straight from Toyota, and need little
if any attention. There's not a lot to be gained there.
Another area that needs attention while we
are here is the combustion chamber itself. You will notice a
sharp edge on either side of the chamber where the squish area
begins. That edge needs to be rounded and smoothed. It
is also a good idea to puy the head on top of the block with the
dowel pins installed and check the rounded parts of the combustion
chamber. If they are not flush with the cylinder walls, that
edge needs to be rounded and smoothed as well. There should be
NO sharp edges in the combustion chamber when you are done.
HOWEVER, don't go crazy with this. The sealing surface
between the cylinders is VERY small, about 8mm across. If you
go overboard here, you could compromise the seal between the
cylinders, and that will ruin a perfectly good head. All you
are doing is removing the sharp edge to prevent autoignition.
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER Now
that our hands are numb and frozen from holding the die grinder and
making a big mess with aluminum chips all over the shop floor, we
can clean everything up and get ready for assembly. I
typically cheat. I get everything basically clean, then insert
the buckets into the head and bolt on the cams. I mark each of
the valves with a permanent marker so I know where they go, then I
put in a shim on the valve I want to check and install the valve
without the spring or retainer. I typically use a medium
thickness shim, then I see how much I will need to shorten the stem
to stay in a reasonable range. Sometimes this means having the
thinnest possible shim available to check clearance. I do this
without the retainer and springs so that I can measure the overall
length of the stem (there is a minimum spec, DON'T ignore it or you
will be dropping valves!) and trim the length to suit the shims I
have on hand. If you have access to a complete set of shims in
the full range of sizes, you don't need to do this, you can just
pick out the correct shim and install it. Of course if you
have a set of shims like that, I want to be YOUR friend! So we
go down all 24 valves, and select the right shims and trim the
valves where necessary. On to measuring the
chamber volume. For this drill, you will need a few typically
not available tools. You need a laboratory burette, it should
be accurate to 0.1 cc or better. If you can find one that is
about 30cc, it will make the job much easier, since we are measuring
somewhere around 55-60 cc. You need to do this to measure your
compression ratio. So, get a piece of clear plexiglass big enough to
cover one of the combustion chambers, drill two smallish holes in
it, install the valves with a grease seal around the seat, then put
the plexiglass over the chamber with another light grease seal.
Now take the burette, fill it with solvent or some other
convenient fluid, but not water, it doesn't seem to work well for
this, and please don't use gasoline for the obvious reasons.
Fill the sealed chamber with solvent, and measure the exact
volume to 0.1 cc. This is your combustion chamber volume, and
your engine builder really needs to know this number. Also,
you will want to be sure that all of your combustion chambers are
within 0.1 cc of each other. It can make the difference
between a detonated and destroyed cylinder, or just driving home
normally. Document this, and save that document in a safe
place. It will become valuable down the road when you need to
do this again. Finally, we clean up the head
one more time, maybe I forgot to mention, but NOTHING beats hot
soapy water for getting engine parts clean. Solvent tanks do a
wonderful job of removing grease, but there is always a film of dirt
left after the solvent is gone, so I always do final prep with water
based cleaners (avoid the temptation to use Castrol SuperClean on
aluminum, you'll be glad you did, it has lye in it that makes
aluminum ugly) like Simple Green or liquid laundry detergent that is
properly diluted. Rinse thoroughly with the hottest water you
can stand and blow out all the holes with air. I use Red Line
assembly lube because it really works. My favorite test is to
take a spot of Red Line's assembly lube and put it in a small
container with some engine oil. Swish it around, watch it
completely disappear. Try that with a lithium grease based
assembly lube! I have also seen this same lube completely
protect an engine that had the oil pump fail on start up. We
ran the thing up and down the street twice, fairly hard, then
realized it wasn't a bad wire, there really was NO oil pressure.
The engine was perfect on disassembly, even the rod and main
bearings were as new. It works. At
this point we are home free. Installing the seals, springs,
retainers, and keepers is really a no brainer. Just don't
forget to tap each of the valves with a plastic hammer to seat the
keepers before you install the buckets and shims.
Got
questions? Think I'm clueless and need an education?
Send me an email.
Lance
The above article is copyright Lance
Wolrab and TO4R.com and cannot be reproduced in any way without
written permission from the author.
|
JUN 24TH '05 ryan woon
updates!
JUN 22ND '05 john firth
updates with new pics!
JUN 18TH '05 john firth
updates with new info!
JUN 5TH '05 garth
updates with 2 new pics!
MAY 18TH '05 PT71GTQ added to turbo
database!
MAR 17TH '05 garth weaver
joins TO4R.com!
FEB 23RD '05 GT47 series turbos added to
turbo database!
FEB 6TH '05 jon
pratkanis updates with more photos!
FEB 3RD '05 mark ross joins
TO4R.com! jon
pratkanis joins TO4R.com!
OCT 19TH '04 justin
infurna joins TO4R.com!
SEP 26TH '04 son nguyen
updates!
SEP 23RD '04 jim edwards
REjoins TO4R.com! peter blach
adds new photos!
JUN 4TH '04 brian
robards joins TO4R.com!
APR 22ND '04 peter blach
debuts his new car!
APR 7TH '04 brian denham
joins TO4R.com! cang ly joins
TO4R.com!
FEB 14TH '04 brett todd
updates!
FEB 11TH '04 brett todd
joins TO4R.com!
DEC 2ND '03 jake herron
joins TO4R.com!
OCT 16TH '03 bill robards
updates! marcus frost
updates! mike carlin
updates! tony nguyen
joins TO4R.com! ryan woon joins
TO4R.com!
AUG 26TH '03 tim robards
updates! john firth
updates! mike carlin
joins TO4R.com!
JUL 4TH '03 son nguyen
joins TO4R.com! peter
ibrahim joins TO4R.com!
JUN 11TH '03 lance
mochida updates! peter blach
updates with new photos! john firth
joins TO4R.com!
MAY 5TH '03 mani
jayasinghe updates! steve wilson
joins TO4R.com!
APR 12TH '03 peter blach
updates with his uber-powerful 98!
MAR 25TH '03 bill robards
debuts his magnificent electric blue widebody supra!
JAN 10TH '03 lance
mochida joins TO4R.com! sal patel
joins TO4R.com!
NOV 12TH '02 ken
henderson updates with new pics!
NOV 9TH '02 john salmi
joins TO4R.com! keith ta joins
TO4R.com!
OCT 25TH '02 david bobé
joins TO4R.com!
SEP 16TH '02 bill robards
joins TO4R.com! sid nguyen
joins TO4R.com!
AUG 12TH '02 john minert
updates - new pics!
|